韩国三级视频-日韩操-视频一二区-久草欧美-五月天婷婷丁香花-动漫美女靠逼-韩国一区二区三区视频-美女扒开内裤让男人桶-亚洲AV无码精品一区二区三区-无码内射中文字幕岛国片-亚洲成色网

Australian tax agency to crack down on lawyers protecting tax-evading clients

Source: Xinhua| 2019-02-13 11:51:11|Editor: Xiang Bo
Video PlayerClose

CANBERRA, Feb. 13 (Xinhua) -- Australia's tax collector has announced a crackdown on lawyers who misuse legal privilege to protect their clients.

In a post on its website, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) said it was preparing to launch "range of (legal) cases in the short to medium term" against offending lawyers who would face a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment.

Under Australian law, courts and law enforcement agencies cannot compel legal practitioners to disclose communications with their clients.

However, ATO alleges that lawyers are using the power to shield their clients from convictions for tax evasion, protecting thousands of documents sought by the agency.

"It's just multiple orders of magnitude over what you'd expect for an ordinary privilege claim," Deputy Commissioner Jeremy Hirschhorn told News Corp Australia on Wednesday.

"The thing we have seen hints of, which I hope not to be the case, is the firm helping the client discover its non-tax purpose.

"The firm says, 'Here's some we prepared earlier which you may find useful', which are then presented to the commissioner as the real justification.

He said that the ATO would target a small number of legal practitioners at Australia's leading firms.

The use of privilege has become a major challenge for government agency's to overcome in recent months.

National Australia Bank (NAB) in August 2018 unsuccessfully claimed privilege over documents related to its fee-for-no-service misconduct that it did not want scrutinized by the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Service Industry.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the nation's corporate regulator, is currently fighting financial services giant AMP in the Federal Court over AMP's refusal to produce its own fee-for-no-service documents, over which it has claimed legal privilege.

TOP STORIES
EDITOR’S CHOICE
MOST VIEWED
EXPLORE XINHUANET
010020070750000000000000011100001378181871
主站蜘蛛池模板: 兴山县| 容城县| 耿马| 兰西县| 大关县| 石屏县| 浦北县| 鄂伦春自治旗| 靖州| 德州市| 子洲县| 家居| 福安市| 阿城市| 久治县| 卢氏县| 美姑县| 陆丰市| 庆安县| 淮安市| 三都| 将乐县| 安龙县| 漠河县| 红原县| 靖江市| 乐昌市| 仁怀市| 南京市| 蕉岭县| 蓬安县| 盐城市| 勃利县| 新竹县| 盐亭县| 昌图县| 奉贤区| 新宁县| 孟州市| 开阳县| 江津市|